Author Topic: 1954 Automatic  (Read 8169 times)

Ricks

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3608
  • 1953 Automatic
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2013, 10:34:49 AM »
Pete, I just ordered a pair. So cheap I figured, what the heck!
Rick

pd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3109
    • View Profile
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2013, 11:18:30 AM »
I don't blame ya , Rick . I'd do the same .

Please , let us know how those work out .
Goes around , Comes around . :)

Sonrisers

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 354
    • View Profile
    • www.elegantoakandmore.com
    • Email
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2013, 06:30:04 PM »
Do these shoes have to be modified?? or do you think they will just fit? Look the same to me.

Ricks

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3608
  • 1953 Automatic
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2013, 07:56:07 PM »
Do these shoes have to be modified?? or do you think they will just fit? Look the same to me.

I will give a report on these as soon as I get them.  They look like they should fit without modification.
Rick

Ricks

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3608
  • 1953 Automatic
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2013, 10:06:09 AM »
I tried those shoes I ordered. They just are not right. The radius of the shoe is bigger than stock, and the shoe itself is longer. I probably could get it to work on the brakes, but with the clutch, it needs the correct radius to sit on the hub properly.

Picture 1:  As delivered with springs
Picture 2:  New shoe in back, stock in front. New shoe 1/8" wider, which would have been easy to fix
Picture 3:  Sock shoe on top, new on bottom. Notice how much longer new shoe is. I belt sanded this down to close stock length
Picture 4:  New on left, stock on right
Picture 5:  New shoes on clutch. You can see here they just don't fit right. The radius is too big, and the shoe is too long.

We will call those a failed experiment! I know there are some out there that are truly a 5" radius: if I could match up a pair in person I would give this another shot. I know Bill Miller had found some, but that company is no longer around.
Rick

Ricks

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3608
  • 1953 Automatic
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2013, 10:09:17 AM »
Here is a comparison of a stock kickstand and a 2" extended one.  The extended kickstand bike sits much more upright, and looks better imo.
Rick

pd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3109
    • View Profile
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #21 on: May 26, 2013, 03:41:19 PM »
Close , but no cigar on those shoes . :(  At least they didn't cost a ton .

Thanks for being the cavy , Rick . ;)

So , the search continues .

 That 2" does make a noticeable difference .  I guess she was right . :D
Goes around , Comes around . :)

Ricks

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3608
  • 1953 Automatic
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1954 Automatic
« Reply #22 on: May 26, 2013, 04:12:05 PM »


 That 2" does make a noticeable difference .  I guess she was right . :D

How did you know I was Irish?  LOL

I feel that the 54 has more power  than the 53.  I wonder if the port work I did made the difference?  I almost want to pull motor apart and try the same things on it.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2014, 05:47:50 AM by RickS »
Rick

pd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3109
    • View Profile
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #23 on: May 26, 2013, 06:06:01 PM »
Just a lucky guess ... ;)

What did you do to your 55 ports ?
Goes around , Comes around . :)

Ricks

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3608
  • 1953 Automatic
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #24 on: May 26, 2013, 06:20:54 PM »
Opened up the inside of the crank, cleaned up the transition of the crank port, cleaned up the ports on the head.
Rick

pd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3109
    • View Profile
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #25 on: May 26, 2013, 06:59:33 PM »
All of those steps eased the transition of fuel mix from the carb to the exhaust , not to mention the crank shaft is a bit lighter . Build an expansion chamber and you'll have a white knuckle bike . :D
Goes around , Comes around . :)

Ricks

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3608
  • 1953 Automatic
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #26 on: May 26, 2013, 07:27:09 PM »
All of those steps eased the transition of fuel mix from the carb to the exhaust , not to mention the crank shaft is a bit lighter . Build an expansion chamber and you'll have a white knuckle bike . :D

Yeah, I bet I'm up to 4 1/2 horsepower now!
Rick

pd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3109
    • View Profile
Re: 1955 Automatic
« Reply #27 on: May 26, 2013, 08:14:18 PM »
 When are you gonna add the brake parachute mod ? ;)

Seriously , any gain in motor performance is more than welcome .

I've been thinking about inserting a sleeve in the intake throat to maybe gain a bit better rotary valve performance .
My motor may have too much clearance there .
Goes around , Comes around . :)

Ricks

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3608
  • 1953 Automatic
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1954 Automatic
« Reply #28 on: May 18, 2014, 04:52:27 PM »
I finally got around to taking care of a couple of things that were left on this bike.  I picked up an ignition tower and key switch from Wayne at Portland last year and hooked it up. No more ghetto wire hanging to ground out the motor.  I also installed the tail light and wired that up.  I am going to work on getting this one registered and insured, so I can ride it to town.
Rick

kartjockey

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1645
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1954 Automatic
« Reply #29 on: May 18, 2014, 05:30:05 PM »
We should all be styling when we get to Portland!